SEO
Title and description with their length, canonical, robots, Open Graph, languages (hreflang) and llms.txt
Compare
I save a card for my site and for the top three on Google, and open them in a table, side by side.
By hand
Comparing by hand means opening each site, copying data into a spreadsheet and redoing it when anything changes.
How
I save a card of each site while I inspect it and then put them together in a single table.
What
The table lines up each site's SEO, structure, schema, fonts and colors, speed and a capture in columns.
Free & Pro
For free I compare 2 sites and save 3 cards. Until Pro launches, the full comparison and its export are free.
Uses
I export it to CSV or Markdown and use it in a client proposal, before designing or in an SEO audit.
Limits
It doesn't compare traffic, keywords or backlinks: that takes third-party data. I only use what can be read on the page itself.
Questions
I check whether I can compare for free, where the cards are stored and which format it exports.
Next
I move on to the SEO inspector, the design system or pricing.
Waitlist
I want to compare my site with the competition: I join the waitlist to try it among the first.
Flagship feature
With Smart Design Inspector you save a card for every website you visit (SEO, headings, schema, fonts, colors and speed) and compare several of them in a table you can export to CSV or Markdown.
Comparing 2 websites is free forever
| yourclient.example | competitor-a.example | competitor-b.example | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title | 58 charsOK | 74 charsNeeds work | 52 charsOK |
| H1 | 1OK | 0Missing | 1OK |
| Schema | OrganizationOK | —Missing | ProductOK |
| Font | Inter | Poppins | DM Sans |
| Color | #2563EB | #16A34A | #0B0B0B |
| LCP | 1.8 sOK | 3.4 sNeeds work | 2.1 sOK |
Criterion,yourclient.example,competitor-a.example,competitor-b.exampleTitle,58 chars (OK),74 chars (Needs work),52 chars (OK)H1,1 (OK),0 (Missing),1 (OK)Schema,Organization (OK),— (Missing),Product (OK)Font,Inter,Poppins,DM SansColor,#2563EB,#16A34A,#0B0B0BLCP,1.8 s (OK),3.4 s (Needs work),2.1 s (OK)| Criterion | yourclient.example | competitor-a.example | competitor-b.example || --- | --- | --- | --- || Title | 58 chars (OK) | 74 chars (Needs work) | 52 chars (OK) || H1 | 1 (OK) | 0 (Missing) | 1 (OK) || Schema | Organization (OK) | — (Missing) | Product (OK) || Font | Inter | Poppins | DM Sans || Color | #2563EB | #16A34A | #0B0B0B || LCP | 1.8 s (OK) | 3.4 s (Needs work) | 2.1 s (OK) |You open your website and three competitors’. You check each title with one extension, the headings with another and the fonts with a third. You copy every value into a spreadsheet. The next day, half of it is gone and you have to open them all again.
Tools that compare websites stick to one thing: speed, links or traffic. None of them puts design and SEO in the same table.
Open the website and click Save card. The extension saves the title, description, headings, structured data, fonts, palette, Core Web Vitals and a screenshot.
Repeat for each competitor.
Open Compare and pick the cards. The differences are highlighted.
Export the table to CSV (for your spreadsheet) or to Markdown (for your report, or to hand it to an AI).
SEO
Title and description with their length, canonical, robots, Open Graph, languages (hreflang) and llms.txt
Structure
H1, number of H2s and H3s, skipped levels
Structured data
Schema types found (Organization, Product, FAQPage…)
Design
Fonts and where they come from, type scale, color palette
Speed
LCP, CLS and INP measured during your visit
Screenshot
An image of the page for your report
| Free€0forever | Pro€49one-time payment | |
|---|---|---|
| Saved cards | 3 | Unlimited |
| Websites side by side in the table | 2 | As many as you save |
| Export to CSV or Markdown | — |
Their website against Google’s top three for their service, in one table.
Which fonts and colors the industry uses, and what the top-ranking site does.
Who has schema, who has no H1 and who loads slowest.
Not traffic, keywords or backlinks. Those need third-party data like Semrush’s or Similarweb’s. The comparison only uses what can be read on the page itself.
Yes. The free version saves 3 cards and compares 2 websites on screen. To export the table or compare more websites, you need Pro.
In your browser. They aren’t uploaded to any server and you don’t need an account.
Yes. Each URL is a card, so you can compare the home page with a service page, or two versions of the same page.
Yes, as long as you can see them in your browser. The extension reads the page exactly as you see it.
CSV, which opens in Excel or Google Sheets, and Markdown, for reports or to paste into a chat with an AI.
It’s from your own visit, measured live. Real-user data (CrUX) will come in a later version.
Chrome, Edge, Brave, Arc, Opera and Vivaldi, on Windows, Mac and Linux, from version 1.0. It works the same everywhere because the browser runs the extension, not the operating system. The code is ready to be brought to Firefox and Safari without a rewrite. While it’s in development, things may change.
Waitlist
Smart Design Inspector is in development. Leave your email and we’ll let you know the day it goes live on the Chrome Web Store, with the 3 Pro features free in early access.
One email on launch day and very few more · Unsubscribe in one click
Cookies
We use Google Analytics to see how many people visit and which pages work, only if you accept. No advertising. Cookie policy.